While I’m obviously not gay, it seems that lately I am frequently confronted with issues about homosexuality which have caused me to deeply evaluate where I stand on the issue. I’ve always prided myself on being an open-minded, accepting person, but is that fact at odds with my moral and spiritual beliefs? Is it possible to be both a supporter of homosexuals and a Christian?
The first question I have to ask is this – “is homosexuality a sin?” It seems that in recent times, being gay has been equated to drug abuse or incest or even murder. Homosexuals have been clumped into a group that has been belittled, ostracized, mocked, and sometimes even beaten or killed. Is being gay an offense worthy of this punishment? Does God truly believe this, or is it just our cultural and spiritual leaders who believe this?
The only way to truly answer this, is to turn to the source – the Bible. First of all, contrary to what one might think, there are very few verses in the Bible which deal with this subject at all. With all the controversy and media coverage lately, one might believe that this was a very important subject, but apparently not so in Biblical times – or at least this is not reflected in the Bible. There are really only four scriptures that even mention homosexuality: the Levitical Laws, 1 Cor 6:9, Romans 1:26-27, and the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Leviticus
There are two versus from Leviticus which are often quoted:
Leviticus 18:22- “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.” (KJV)
Leviticus 20:13 – “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them” (KJV)
While it seems obvious that these versus condemn homosexual acts, one must look at the context with which they were written. The book of Leviticus was written to lay out a set of legal rules and priestly rituals. The above words were written in the Holiness Code of Leviticus which was a ritual manual for Israel’s priests. Unless you think of yourself as ancient Israeli priest, do the words apply to you?
Leviticus set up life rules to distinguish Jews from the Pagans of the time – who often indulged in male cult prostitutes and bestiality. Male homosexual prostitutes were commonly worshipped in the temples as a surrogate to the pagan gods. This act of “abomination” of worship was clearly looked down upon, but this was not the same as a relationship between two men or two women. Obviously, God didn’t want his people worshipping other gods, but sexuality outside of the temple was another matter.
The Levitical laws also prohibited eating pork, shellfish, and trimming one’s beard; while it condoned actions like killing a child who curses his parents! Adulterers were to be put to death, one couldn’t eat from a fruit tree for five years, and tattoos and certain haircuts were strictly forbidden. If you decide to obey these rules, than why is it okay to pick and choose which ones to follow? I personally believe that when Jesus arrived with a new covenant that these ancient commands became – for lack of a better word: obsolete.
Sodom and Gomorrah
Perhaps the most popular instance of homosexuality in the Bible comes from the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. In this story, God appears to Abraham and tells him that he is going to destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah due to their wickedness. Abraham makes a deal with God that he would not destroy the cities if a mere 10 righteous people could be found. Two angels of God visit the city of Sodom where they stay with Abraham’s nephew Lot. Eventually God does destroy the cities, but not before giving us the verses of much controversy.
Genesis 19:4 – “But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: 5 – And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.”
The first question is what exactly did this mob mean by wanting to “know them.” At first glance one might think that the people of Sodom simply wanted to know who was in Lot’s house. Perhaps they were just being protective of their village and wanted to meet these strangers. Or, maybe they were just being overly hospitable.
But, as you continue reading, you see that Lot refuses to give up the angels to the men of the city, and rather offers up his two virgin daughters. Why would these girls make an adequate substitute if the townspeople simply wanted conversation? Lot says the townspeople are free to “know” his daughters as they see fit. It doesn’t appear that we are talking about a simple handshake here.
If we go back and look at the culture of the time, it was common to use rape as a way to humiliate and establish power over another person. This was done through heterosexual and homosexual means. It was not uncommon for a heterosexual male to rape another man as an act of violence – much like is seen in modern prisons today.
Most academics agree that throughout time, homosexuals generally make up about 10% of the population (Newsweek /15/93, Fortune, 1991, Washington Times, 11/19/91, etc.). It is pretty apparent in the reading that more than a mere 10% of the city was surrounding Lot’s house, therefore it seems likely that this type of power rape or pederastry was what they had in mind. They didn’t want a loving relationship with these men, they wanted domination over them. It seems possible that God destroyed the city, not because they were all gay, but because they were power hungry, violent, and morally deficient.
A similar event occurred in Gilbeah in Judges 19. The people accepted concubine women in place of a man. A concubine was raped until she died and the city was destroyed – for heterosexual rape. The same thing happens to Sheckem’s home town in Genesis 34 when Jacob’s daughter, Dinah is raped. It seems that God is clearly angered by heterosexual rape.
1 Corinthians 6:9
1 Corinthians 6:9 “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.” (KJV)
The main controversy surrounding this passage is in its translation and implied meanings. As the Bible was not originally written in English, obviously the word homosexuality was never used. The KJV version translates the Greek word malakoi into effeminate. There is considerable debate over just what this word means. The same word is translated in both Matthew and Luke to mean soft or fine – as related to clothing. It could also mean loose or pliable, easily influenced or without courage or stability. Our current culture has many connotations associated with the word effeminate that simply didn’t apply in ancient times.
Another argument is that if Paul wanted to refer directly to homosexual behavior, he would have used the word paiderasste, which was the standard Greek term for sexual behavior between males.
Abusers of themselves with mankind could also be interpreted to speak about homosexuality, but that is very vague. This might refer to abusers of slaves, prostitutes, young boy sexual slaves, pedophiles or hebephiles, or women but most surely he was not referring to a loving relationship between two people.
It is generally accepted by many religious scholars that Paul was speaking about catamites – young boys who were kept for the purpose of prostitution, a practice not uncommon in the Greco-Roman world. This again is not referring to a loving, consenting relationship between two adults of equal status.
Romans 1:26
Romans 1:26 “For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet”
In Romans 1, Paul warns against worshipping man instead of God. The love for an idol, which could be another human, is called an unnatural act or lust. He warns against allowing sex to become one’s god, or allowing sex to become something unnatural. He does not specifically discuss what this unnatural conduct would be, but it is likely that he is again talking about the sex god and goddess prostitute worship in the pagan temples.
Paul describes men whose natural preference is for women, and to have sex with a man would violate this. Again he is referring to the act of pederastry. Paul uses the term katergazomai, which would infer that the act would take extreme energy or will to complete. It was common for heterosexual males to rape men captured in battle so as to degrade them. Obviously this would take much anger and vile energy to complete, as it would not be something naturally enjoyable, as is the case with homosexual couples.
Additionally all of these scriptures refer to physical, sexual acts. Nowhere in the Bible does God speak of “being” homosexual. It would be wrong for a man to physically take a woman in a violent act of sexuality. But, is it sinful for the man to be attracted to a woman and not act on it? Is that not the definition of heterosexuality? There is a big difference between loving one woman and being in a commited relationship and sleeping around and engaging in all kinds of licentious acts. This applies to gay and straight people.
Conclusion
We Christians use the Bible to define our moral code. With many issues, it is black and white – the Bible clearly says don’t steal – so we know that is wrong. It isn’t an issue that needs much interpretation. The issue of homosexuality is much more complicated.
None of the scriptures that might, or might not refer to homosexuality, refer to a loving, consenting relationship between two men or two women. The Bible doesn’t clarify for us the issue of whether gays and lesbians are afflicted with sin, or a sort of curse, or perhaps they are just born with a different sexual orientation.
The Bible never refers directly to a homosexual relationship, which is odd because of the relative commonality of the occurrence in Biblical times. It has been suggested by some that the story in Matthew 8 and Luke 7 where Jesus heals a servant of a centurion was about a gay couple. The Greek word used in Matthew’s account to refer to the servant was pais. This could be translated to mean “his master’s male lover.” It was not uncommon for an older, gay man to purchase a “spouse” through a financial transaction, just as men purchased wives. A servant purchased to serve this purpose was often called a pais. And, just like many heterosexual couples, this was often a loving relationship.
Perhaps Jesus didn’t verbalize support for this couple, but it is obvious that he didn’t condemn, or judge them. This was perhaps the first recorded evidence of a Christian displaying tolerance. Jesus didn’t say, “I’m not going to heal you because you are living in sin.” He simply said, “I will come and heal him.”
The most important point here is this: we don’t know exactly where God stands on homosexuality, but we do know where he stands on tolerance. The Bible is very clear on this issue:
- Matthew 7:1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
- Matthew 9:10 And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him and his disciples.
- Mark 9:38 And John answered him, saying, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name, and he followeth not us: and we forbad him, because he followeth not us.
- Mark 9:39 But Jesus said, Forbid him not: for there is no man which shall do a miracle in my name, that can lightly speak evil of me.
- Luke 9:49 And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name; and we forbad him, because he followeth not with us.
- Luke 9:50 And Jesus said unto him, Forbid him not: for he that is not against us is for us.
- 1 Corinthians 13:3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed [the poor], and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.
- 1 Corinthians 13:4 Charity suffereth long, [and] is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, {vaunteth…: or, is not rash}
- Philippians 1:17 But the other of love, knowing that I am set for the defence of the gospel.
- Philippians 1:18 What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice.
- Philippians 2:2 Fulfil ye my joy, that ye be likeminded, having the same love, [being] of one accord, of one mind.
- James 2:1 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory, with respect of persons.
- James 2:2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment; {assembly: Gr. synagogue}
- James 2:3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: {in…: or, well, or, seemly}
- James 2:4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?
- James 2:8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
- James 2:9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
This list could go on and on, but we know, without a doubt that God does not want us to judge or hold prejudice against each other. We were clearly commanded to “love one another,” and this includes blacks, whites, Christians, Arabs, addicts, the obese, the diseased, the elderly, the poor, and….homosexuals.
If being homosexual is a sin, then making them feel unwelcome in church is not going to lead them to a righteous path. If we are unsure of God’s purpose for gays or lesbians, are we not the sinners when we shun them? God created all of us: some have addiction issues, some have physical handicaps, some have lower intelligence, some have mental health problems – we are all different – but we are all God’s children.
To say that a gay man can’t give witness or testimony is to belittle God’s work. If a lesbian woman can sing a hymn in a way that touches your heart, but you choose not to listen because she’s gay, are you not tuning out God’s voice? God works in mysterious ways, and perhaps his intent is for some homosexuals is to bring his message to the gay and lesbian community. How better to do this than through one of their own? After all, it often isn’t those of us sitting in the pews on Sunday that need to hear God’s message.
The Bible is somewhat vague on the issues of homosexuality, but Jesus said loud and clear:
Mark 12:28 “One of the teachers of the law came and heard them debating. Noticing that Jesus had given them a good answer, he asked him, “Of all the commandments, which is the most important?”
29 “The most important one,” answered Jesus, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one. 30 Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength’
31 The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.‘ There is no commandment greater than these.”